Frameworks for Prediction
Chapter 1 begins by surveying various potential frameworks for predicting the landscape of eventual societal regret, such as religious teachings and the standards of international human rights law. In considering and rejecting these and other predictive frameworks, it details historical instances of U.S. regret, as identified primarily by official federal or state apologies, for clues that should have been evident to policymakers and participants in such regrettable practices as slavery, lynching, Jim Crow laws, involuntary sterilizations of the mentally infirm, and land theft from and killings of Native Americans in the origins of the United States. The most common predictive thread running through these abhorrent policies and practices is isolated and identified as the perceived lesser humanity of those we victimized, such as blacks, Natives, and the mentally disabled. Using this lens of dehumanization, later chapters map the terrain of current regrettable practices and policies affecting several groups we have effectively dehumanized—including Mexican immigrants, farmworkers, the poor receiving welfare, the homeless, sexual minorities, murderers awaiting execution, and Muslims and those of Muslim appearance.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.