Knowing Vaccine Injury through Law
Knowing Vaccine Injury through Law
This chapter poses the question of how it matters that we have legalized vaccine injury in the ways that we have. Describing our institution in detail, the chapter focuses on the contemporary, ordinary business of the vaccine court, describing the kinds of professionals who work there and how they do their jobs. The most interesting cases are the middle-ground cases, in which there is some reputable story of how a vaccine might have caused the injury and no studies accepted as definitive that rule it out, and so the court has adapted a way of compensating these people but without full agreement that vaccines are truly the cause. The U.S. vaccine court design is part of a globally shared understanding that some kind of vaccine injury compensation is appropriate, but the chapter shows how the U.S. program stands out among the nineteen other systems across the industrialized world. The chapter also compares the vaccine court to other kinds of domestic alternative compensation schemes such as the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.
Keywords: court, cases, vaccine injury causation, compensation, September 11th Victim Compensation Fund
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
