This conclusion begins by pointing out some of the differences between the foci and findings in this book and those addressed within the psychologist and philosopher William James’s classic The Varieties of Religious Experience. His book focused on religious conversion, whereas this one attends to atheists. James pays most attention to the psychological aspects of conversion, while this book draws readers’ attentions to aspects of social context that shape the expression and experience of atheism. While James argues that religious ideas are variable and only the feeling of finding the sacred is consistent across individual cases, this book shows that, for atheists, the idea of the science versus religion “conflict myth” is constant, whereas the feelings that authenticate this idea are actually variable. This chapter concludes with suggestions about how atheists could offer a more incisive contribution to American public discourse than they do at present.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.