The authors start this chapter with an interview with Dr. Charles Honts, who has served as an expert witness over one hundred times, as a polygraph examiner and about false and coerced confessions. The authors discuss requirements and potential roles of expert witnesses, and then move to relevant topics about which clinical and/or experimental experts may testify. The authors then examine the legal standards and ongoing disputes about admissibility of expert testimony at trial before moving to scientific studies of the impacts of expert testimony on triers of fact. The chapter concludes with a review of experts and the totality of the circumstances.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.