Pretextual Politics and Democratic Inclusion
Pretextual Politics and Democratic Inclusion
Comment On Darby
According to Darby, Du Bois rejected the argument from voter ignorance as a legitimate basis for excluding people from the franchise and defended inclusive democracy as the key to empowering the masses to better their condition. As Darby points out, however, the voter ignorance argument functioned primarily as a pretext for robbing African Americans of political rights. I argue that Du Bois’s struggle with the voter ignorance argument (that is to say, his cognizance of its covert racist intent and his simultaneous attempt to rebut it as a democratically motivated position) illustrates the trap of pretextual arguments in democratic politics, whereby practices that are blatantly at odds with democratic principles are justified on the basis of those principles themselves. Pretextual arguments are difficult for democrats to counter, because they abuse the presumption of sincerity—however rebuttable—built into public discourse. In taking the voter ignorance objection seriously, Du Bois ends up shadow-boxing with a claim that has little persuasive hold on anyone engaged in the debate (racists and anti-racists alike). The important takeaway is less Du Bois’s rebuttal of voter ignorance as a democratic problem and more the persistent menace that pretextual arguments pose in democratic politics.
Keywords: democratic politics, African Americans, inclusion, political rights, voter ignorance
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
