This afterword examines the aftereffects of the Bush administration's legal detours. It first considers how the financial crisis of 2008 exposed the Bush administration's neglect of regulation before turning to the issue of national security. It then discusses the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Boumediene v. Bush, which struck down portions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that had stripped the federal courts of jurisdiction over writs of habeas corpus sought by Guantánamo detainees. In particular, it explains how Boumediene v. Bush dismantled the structure of impunity through geography and ended detours around individualized adjudication of dangerousness. It also explores the question of whether the Obama administration should investigate or prosecute Bush officials and concludes with suggestions on how the detours around the law can be avoided.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.