A Comment on David Dyzenhaus, “Leviathan as a Theory of Transitional Justice”
This chapter remarks on some points of David Dyzenhaus' review on Hobbes' theory of justice, foremost among them is Dyzenhaus' use of the political transition in South Africa to support the theory. Using this point, the chapter shows that theorists of transitional justice think that arguments (e.g. whether transitional justice can be achieved only if the leaders of the old regime are punished for committing atrocities) that are formed within this political transition have universal answers. They believe that a theory could tell whether a particular transitional regime should opt for one extreme or another or choose a middle path. In the same way, Dyzenhaus does not believe that theories of transitional justice are different from ordinary theories of justice, but he does believe that an ordinary theory of justice can serve the same function.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.