This book explores the debate about the use of criminal law to regulate corporate conduct. More specifically, it considers the power of prosecutors to regulate corporations accused of criminal wrongdoing through agreements consisting of nonprosecution agreements (NPAs) and deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs). Also known as settlement agreements, NPAs and DPAs allow companies to avoid indictments so long as they meet the prosecutors' regulatory terms. In many of these agreements, prosecutors impose affirmative obligations on companies to change personnel, revamp their business practices, and adopt new models of corporate governance. This book examines a number of fundamental questions that arise from the practice of corporate regulation by prosecutors, such as how the government should seek to deter corporate misconduct, how to promote good practices in prosecutorial involvement in corporate governance, how to improve coordination and minimize collisions between prosecutors and regulatory agencies, and how much power corporate monitors should have.
Keywords: criminal law, corporate conduct, prosecutors, nonprosecution agreements, deferred prosecution agreements, settlement agreements, corporate governance, corporate misconduct, corporate monitors, corporate regulation
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.