A Comment on Nita Farahany’s “Law and Behavioral Morality”
This chapter supports the conclusion of Professor Nita A. Farahany in the previous chapter that brain-based individuation of criminal justice is neither scientifically possible nor normatively desirable. Accordingly, Farahany suggests that the right target of analysis for scholars in behavioral morality is the typical community member, not the transgressor. Picking up from Farahany's work, this chapter speculates as to whether behavioral moralists could develop an intermediate position that focuses neither on the individual disordered offender nor on the aggregate typical person but on aggregate kinds of abnormalcy—or “unreasonableness.” Finally, it proposes that behavioral moralists will have to identify differences in morally salient perception, affect, or cognition that are stable, atypical, severe, and relevant to the particular offense a person committed.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.