Abolitionism and the Paradox of Lethal Injection
This chapter examines the paradoxical nature of the lethal injection by focusing on the Supreme Court case Baze v. Rees, which affirmed the constitutionality of Kentucky's execution protocols. It begins with an overview of various states' experimentation with execution methods from the mid to late nineteenth century and continuing throughout much of the twentieth century. It then considers the Supreme Court's articulation of the Eighth Amendment doctrine regarding the methods of execution that were adopted as part of this experimentation and goes on to situate Baze v. Rees within the context of a long-standing quest for the perfect execution. It also discusses the alleged failure of the lethal injection to meet the imperatives of the ideal of the perfect execution and considers whether it is wise to pursue the abolition of capital punishment through legal challenges based on methods. The chapter concludes by arguing that the Supreme Court's ruling in Baze v. Rees was a setback for those seeking the abolition of the death penalty.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.