Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Not GuiltyAre the Acquitted Innocent?$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Daniel Givelber and Amy Farrell

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780814732175

Published to NYU Press Scholarship Online: March 2016

DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814732175.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM NYU Press SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.nyu.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of NYU Press Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in NYSO for personal use.date: 26 September 2021



Invisible Innocence

(p.1) 1 Introduction
Not Guilty

Daniel Givelber

Amy Farrell

NYU Press

This introductory chapter provides an overview of people's understanding of acquittals. One of the sources of this understanding comes from a study of nearly four thousand mid-twentieth-century criminal jury trials by University of Chicago law professors Harry Kalven and Han Zeisel—considered the seminal study of judge-jury decision making—and a handful of studies conducted to attempt to replicate its conclusions. Although Kalven and Zeisel provided an in-depth analysis of the trial judge's explanation for the reasons why the jury acquitted when the judge would have convicted, they were not able to provide any direct information about what the people who decided the case—the jurors themselves—thought or believed.

Keywords:   acquittals, criminal jury trials, Harry Kalven, Han Zeisel, judge-jury decision making

NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.