This chapter offers a psychologically-based assessment of common defenses to tort law claims. Defenses that blame plaintiffs for their own injuries resonate strongly with the ethic of individual responsibility. Defenses of consent, assumption of risk, and contributory negligence overlap with psychological predispositions and can be powerful arguments in the courtroom. Similarly, defendants’ assertions of self-defense when protecting persons or property echo strongly held views.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.