Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Civil Justice ReconsideredToward a Less Costly, More Accessible Litigation System$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven P. Croley

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9781479855001

Published to NYU Press Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479855001.001.0001

Show Summary Details

The Unsubstantiated Case for Litigation Reform

The Unsubstantiated Case for Litigation Reform

Chapter:
(p.93) 5 The Unsubstantiated Case for Litigation Reform
Source:
Civil Justice Reconsidered
Author(s):

Steven P. Croley

Publisher:
NYU Press
DOI:10.18574/nyu/9781479855001.003.0006

This chapter assesses the influential critique outlined in the previous chapter. It argues that this dominant critique of the civil litigation system has been merely pled and not proven. It shows that the critique trades on anecdotal evidence that is not accurate and not convincing. The analysis here furthermore shows that available data—including data on win-loss ratios, damages across different types of civil cases, and juries—cast serious doubt on its basic premises. The most influential critique of the civil litigation therefore does not bear close scrutiny, and thus its policy reform agenda is not well grounded. This chapter concludes that if the civil litigation system is flawed, it is not so for the reasons the influential critics have articulated.

Keywords:   reform, data, damages, juries, policy

NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.