Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cosmopolitanisms$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bruce Robbins, Paulo Lemos Horta, and Kwame Anthony Appiah

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9781479829682

Published to NYU Press Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479829682.001.0001

Show Summary Details

A Stoic Critique of Cosmopolitanism

A Stoic Critique of Cosmopolitanism

Chapter:
(p.171) 13 A Stoic Critique of Cosmopolitanism
Source:
Cosmopolitanisms
Author(s):

Phillip Mitsis

Publisher:
NYU Press
DOI:10.18574/nyu/9781479829682.003.0014

Phillip Mitsis offers a polemical corrective to the uses of ancient philosophy in the influential reformulations of cosmopolitanism by Kwame Anthony Appiah and Martha Nussbaum. Appiah and Nussbaum deploy the Stoics in the service of liberal and progressive conceptions of cosmopolitanism. According to Mitsis, however, their readings reverse the Stoics’ original meaning. Commenting on Zeno’s biography of Alexander the Great, the Stoics admired Alexander as conqueror. He accomplished, they thought, what the philosophers could not, bringing different peoples under the same system of law. Those who see cosmopolitanism today as Western imperialism in liberal disguise would recognize the precedent.

Keywords:   Stoicism, Alexander the Great, empire, Western imperialism

NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.