Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Judging AddictsDrug Courts and Coercion in the Justice System$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rebecca Tiger

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780814784068

Published to NYU Press Scholarship Online: March 2016

DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814784068.001.0001

Show Summary Details



(p.133) Conclusion
Judging Addicts

Rebecca Tiger

NYU Press

This concluding chapter evaluates alternatives to drug courts and the criminalization of drugs and drug users that entail neither punitive oversight nor coercion. It highlights the contradictions in the existing drug policy, where some people are punished for using mind-altering substances while others are encouraged to use them via prescription pharmaceuticals. It also challenges four major assumptions that guide our views on drug use: that habitual substance use is a disease, that abstinence is the only cure for the disease of addiction, that abstinence from drugs can be achieved only through treatment, and that coerced treatment is better than voluntary treatment for certain addicts. The chapter argues that combining punishment and treatment will never work to eradicate habitual substance use. Instead, it calls for a radical reorientation in the way we understand drugs, drug users, the value of sobriety, and the role of the state in coercing health.

Keywords:   drug courts, criminalization of drugs, drug users, coercion, drug use, abstinence, coerced treatment, punishment, drugs, sobriety

NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.