Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Revoking CitizenshipExpatriation in America from the Colonial Era to the War on Terror$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ben Herzog

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780814760383

Published to NYU Press Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814760383.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.137) Conclusion
Source:
Revoking Citizenship
Author(s):

Ben Herzog

Publisher:
NYU Press
DOI:10.18574/nyu/9780814760383.003.0011

The conclusion connects the arguments discussed throughout the book with claims regarding the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and birthright citizenship. Up to the middle of the twentieth century, the idea of citizenship itself constructed a national world order that demanded exclusive political membership and thus favored expatriation of those who acquired dual citizenship; to a certain extent this is true even today. Following Pierre Bourdieu, the key claim of this study is that the loss of citizenship is not determined by its location within the field of citizenship but derives from the fact that the game is played. The policy of expatriation results from the uncontested assumption that the world is divided into sovereign political entities and that rights are dispensed accordingly.

Keywords:   Citizenship Clause, Fourteenth Amendment, dual citizenship, exclusive political membership, Pierre Bourdieu, birthright citizenship

NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.