This chapter highlights how the Manhattan Youth Part managed the most basic tension at work in the practice of trying youths as adults—that, regardless of their statutorily designated “adult” status, defendants were adolescent social actors—and considers the role their families played. It also reveals the contradictions with the New York criminal justice system's own legal labeling practices by exploring the courtroom narratives of six kids. Alonzo, Walter, and Isaac each had one case in the Family Court and another in the criminal court, resulting in each being prosecuted as both a juvenile and as an adult at the same time. On the other hand, Jorge's, Kendrick's, and Dario's stories reveal another internal contradiction of legal labeling—that of being legally labeled as an adult for prosecution and, at the same time, as a child in need of the care and custody of the state through child protective services.
NYU Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.